<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>baldysblog.co.uk &#187; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baldysblog.co.uk/category/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk</link>
	<description>Mainly Political, Right of Centre and Personal, not Party Political</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:32:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Killing Babies</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/03/04/killing-babies/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/03/04/killing-babies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Being a Catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has any society that had a formalised system of killing its own citizens, ever survived for long ? If we accept that infanticide is acceptable, then why not any kind of euthanasia ? The liberal mindset thinks of "assisted dying" as another "personal choice" but once these things are accepted as normal, where might they lead ?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/03/04/killing-babies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Self Serving and Pathetic Pleading</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/01/24/self-serving-and-pathetic-pleading/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/01/24/self-serving-and-pathetic-pleading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the total “arrogance” of a post WWII Europe during which most countries failed 'miserably' in any legal context to even uphold the right to breath for their citizens, should these 'artificial institutions' so needed and so lacking then in human conscience, even imagine that they hold sway, clearly nothing has been learned. Pinning the “Rosette of Universal Law” on a donkey, is still a donkey with a rosette. What arrogance !]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/01/24/self-serving-and-pathetic-pleading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Proposed Right to Die</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/01/06/a-proposed-right-to-die/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/01/06/a-proposed-right-to-die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality & Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To my mind the topic reflects upon a fundamentally flawed and infantile society that refuses to face the reality of mankind's existence both in the past and going forward, as being one of difficulty and pain both mentally and physically. A bit like natural birth being replaced by "C Section" deliveries so let's "top and tail" both life and death, mechanically as a consumer service administered by the NHS !]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/01/06/a-proposed-right-to-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Loony Left&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/10/10/the-loony-left/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/10/10/the-loony-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliamentary Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So from here comes the real 'argument': Should those 'Rules' be based upon the 'Spirit' of what was intended or the 'Letter' of the language in which the legislation was drafted ? My 'personal argument' is not based upon me being "A Little Englander, Homo-Phobic or Xenophobic", it is based upon "What has been shown to work here..." over very many generations, the "Spirit/Intent" over rides the "Letter"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/10/10/the-loony-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To keep DNA or Not</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/06/27/to-keep-dna-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/06/27/to-keep-dna-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There will obviously be arguments both for and against retaining DNA samples but, we really should err on the side of basic principles which in this case, is the presumption of innocence, the samples should be destroyed and it be a criminal offence for them to be retained.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/06/27/to-keep-dna-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Strauss-Khan Scandal</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/05/20/the-strauss-khan-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/05/20/the-strauss-khan-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 12:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomatic Immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We do not know whether the man is guilty or not but the American legal system will likely grind out the truth, it will be very, very uncomfortable for both the accused and the accuser. However what we do know for a certainty is that he no longer has a career of any kind...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/05/20/the-strauss-khan-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was the Killing of Bin Laden Correct ?</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/05/05/was-the-killing-of-bin-laden-correct/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/05/05/was-the-killing-of-bin-laden-correct/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 15:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=2973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The very worse mistake by the Bush Administration was the setting up of Guantanamo Bay as a method of holding prisoners without trial which is forbidden under the American Constitution, and even worse was to allow torture or "rendition" albeit by third parties. Both these things have seriously debased American standards both within and without the USA, this action of killing Bin Laden did not do that.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/05/05/was-the-killing-of-bin-laden-correct/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Total Load of Old Cobblers</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/03/09/total-load-of-old-cobblers/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/03/09/total-load-of-old-cobblers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reform and Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=2878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What has happened in Europe and happens on a daily basis, is that whether the ECHR or the EU, they are used as excuses by national politicians to escape responsibility for what are obviously unpopular decisions with their electorate and it is this, that is causing the 'strain' and will eventually lead to serious fracturing of the current situation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/03/09/total-load-of-old-cobblers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Practical Limits of Power</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/02/21/the-practical-limits-of-power/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/02/21/the-practical-limits-of-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reform and Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliamentary Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=2845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whilst I would happily advocate withdrawing from both the EU and although a separate body, also the jurisdiction of the ECHR, I wonder if we have the courage and capability to take charge of our own affairs ? I wonder if the Legal and Political Establishments have even the intellectual capabilities and passion to do so, it might well prove far too much hard work for them to take on.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/02/21/the-practical-limits-of-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limiting Pan National Courts/and Other Such Stuff&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/02/11/limiting-pan-national-courtsand-other-such-stuff/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/02/11/limiting-pan-national-courtsand-other-such-stuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=2818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The basis of any legal system is a combination of a "due process" and the ability to impose sanctions including in some countries, death or incarceration. Between Nations, this latter part of the deal is called WAR, it just really isn't the same at any level as the relationship between the citizen and the state.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/02/11/limiting-pan-national-courtsand-other-such-stuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

