<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>baldysblog.co.uk &#187; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baldysblog.co.uk/category/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk</link>
	<description>Mainly Political, Right of Centre and Personal, not Party Political</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:48:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cameron and Bloody Sunday</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/06/16/cameron-and-bloody-sunday/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/06/16/cameron-and-bloody-sunday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=2280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The Bloody Sunday killings were unjustified and unjustifiable”, the Prime Minster said in the House of Commons yesterday, announcing the findings of the Saville Report and making a full and public apology for the events of that day. The key point that he made was that whilst over a thousand members of the Army and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/06/16/cameron-and-bloody-sunday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Liberties</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/01/16/civil-liberties/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/01/16/civil-liberties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=1835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Howard Jacobson wrote an interesting article in the Independent: “Civil liberties or civil protection – which is the more important?” http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/howard-jacobson/howard-jacobson-civil-liberties-or-civil-protection-ndash-which-is-the-more-important-1869544.html The majority of people who mailed in were hostile to his stance but my own feeling was that neither &#8216;side&#8217; was approaching the problems sensibly either. The Basic Problem On the one hand we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/01/16/civil-liberties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Very Stupid Policing</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/12/03/very-stupid-policing/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/12/03/very-stupid-policing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=1681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was an article in today&#8217;s Independent about photographers being harassed by Police when taking pictures in a public place under something called Section 44. For a more detailed explanation, please read the article: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/warning-do-not-take-this-picture-1833127.html However in simple terms, a “Section 44” is in fact an area deemed to be a potential terrorist target so [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/12/03/very-stupid-policing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Desperate Politicians and Desperate Newspapers</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/11/16/desperate-politicians-and-desperate-newspapers/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/11/16/desperate-politicians-and-desperate-newspapers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=1620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a deathly combination, a newspaper, The Independent fighting for survival and a political party, the LibDems knowing that they haven&#8217;t made the progress that they should have over the past 12-18 months, joining in a campaign of “Parliamentary Reform. The Editorial and links to associated articles including Mr Clegg&#8217;s can be found here- [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/11/16/desperate-politicians-and-desperate-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lisbon Treaty</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/10/07/the-lisbon-treaty/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/10/07/the-lisbon-treaty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=1478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an interesting article in today&#8217;s Times written by Roger Boyes in which he seems, “more in sorrow style” to regret the British Euroscepticism attitude. It is rather oddly written and amusingly, one comment on the article said, having read it, he was now convinced that the UK should leave the EU. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article6863712.ece To [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/10/07/the-lisbon-treaty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paying With Other People&#8217;s Lives</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/09/13/paying-with-other-peoples-lives/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/09/13/paying-with-other-peoples-lives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=1389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have never been a fan of Janet Street Porter and that was rather confirmed by a guest column she wrote in today&#8217;s Independent entitled “After Turing, the shameful abuse of gays goes on” and as someone pointed out, it should have read, “After Turing, the shameful abuse of gays in Jamaica, goes on.” But [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/09/13/paying-with-other-peoples-lives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Professional Politician Problem</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/08/31/the-professional-politician-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/08/31/the-professional-politician-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=1352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something that has become all to the “norm” over these past decade or so is the constant rise of the “professional politician”, a person who from University goes down a career path that is totally unrelated to a normal world of work until eventually they emerge as the candidate for a Parliamentary Seat. Once safely [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/08/31/the-professional-politician-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keeping the Monarchy</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/06/25/keeping-the-monarchy/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/06/25/keeping-the-monarchy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=1115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not quite sure what point Matthew Norman was trying to make in today&#8217;s Independent because he did seem to wander all over the place, you can judge for yourself: http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/matthew-norman/matthew-norman-a-prince-and-his-indulgent-public-1717971.html I think the starting point was the “extra £3 million that the Prince of Wales cost the taxpayer last year simply because the Government [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/06/25/keeping-the-monarchy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Presidential System</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/06/23/a-presidential-system/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/06/23/a-presidential-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=1106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the election of Bercow as Speaker, Steve Richards writing in the Independent today was speculating about “real reform” and the Separation of Powers. “A few years ago the Labour MP and ardent constitutional reformer, Graham Allen, put forward a proposal for a presidential system in Britain. I thought at the time he was living [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/06/23/a-presidential-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soft in the Head&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/06/09/soft-in-the-head/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/06/09/soft-in-the-head/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=1078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me start by saying that I have every sympathy for any journalist trying to write something interesting about British politics this day, what can one say ? The Independent Leader showed how not to do it as the excerpt below shows: “Even the UK Independence Party, seen as a great victor on Sunday night, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/06/09/soft-in-the-head/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
