<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>baldysblog.co.uk &#187; Anglosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baldysblog.co.uk/tag/anglosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk</link>
	<description>Mainly Political, Right of Centre and Personal, not Party Political</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:32:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Euro Crisis and the G8</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/05/20/the-euro-crisis-and-the-g8/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/05/20/the-euro-crisis-and-the-g8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 20:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This picture of the G8 Leaders sitting around a table together, is very symbolic because whilst they can arrange a meeting and deliver a conference, the one thing that they can&#8217;t do is deliver their electorates. Solving the Euro crisis would be simple if either the Eurozone countries opted for a “United States of Europe” [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/05/20/the-euro-crisis-and-the-g8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Self Serving and Pathetic Pleading</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/01/24/self-serving-and-pathetic-pleading/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/01/24/self-serving-and-pathetic-pleading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the total “arrogance” of a post WWII Europe during which most countries failed 'miserably' in any legal context to even uphold the right to breath for their citizens, should these 'artificial institutions' so needed and so lacking then in human conscience, even imagine that they hold sway, clearly nothing has been learned. Pinning the “Rosette of Universal Law” on a donkey, is still a donkey with a rosette. What arrogance !]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/01/24/self-serving-and-pathetic-pleading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Proposed Right to Die</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/01/06/a-proposed-right-to-die/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/01/06/a-proposed-right-to-die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality & Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To my mind the topic reflects upon a fundamentally flawed and infantile society that refuses to face the reality of mankind's existence both in the past and going forward, as being one of difficulty and pain both mentally and physically. A bit like natural birth being replaced by "C Section" deliveries so let's "top and tail" both life and death, mechanically as a consumer service administered by the NHS !]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/01/06/a-proposed-right-to-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Building on a Past Success</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/11/16/building-on-a-past-success/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/11/16/building-on-a-past-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JLR and Tata are 'right on the money', the bench mark is Range Rover rather than Land Rover because that was the model range that took the marque into a different market. Albeit initially, on the back of the reputation of  a utilitarian vehicle but in the process, created an "as viable product legacy" in Range Rover as in the previous Land Rover which is where we now are at.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/11/16/building-on-a-past-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad Move Dave&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/10/22/bad-move-dave/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/10/22/bad-move-dave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real problem is not the vote itself which is not binding on the Government anyway and by allowing a free vote with a couple of “Trusty Lieutenants” detailed off to insert amendments that took away any particular time lines by which said Referendum must take place, so easy to manage and the fact that this wasn't done raises more alarm than enough.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/10/22/bad-move-dave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changing Nothing&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/10/20/changing-nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/10/20/changing-nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Far East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In economic terms, we all seem similarly as frozen and devoid of fresh ideas as the Generals on all sides were when faced with trench warfare in The First World War ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/10/20/changing-nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moral or Amoral ?</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/10/07/moral-or-amoral/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/10/07/moral-or-amoral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 17:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliamentary Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, the question being asked about the Drone strike that killed Anwar al-Awlaki a US citizen, does have a unique legal context within the boundaries of the United States based upon the 'Constitution' and the quite distinct Separation of Powers within that designed to protect the 'citizen' from any tyranny from any branch of Government. What it is not about is the technology as such]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/10/07/moral-or-amoral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remembering the Events of 9/11</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/09/10/remembering-the-events-of-911/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/09/10/remembering-the-events-of-911/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baldy Tales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Second Iraq War began on March 20, 2003 and was a major mistake if only because of the total incompetence or lack of any post conflict planning. A 'surgical' war turned into a bloody nightmare for all concerned and the repercussions still echo to this day as does the flow of blood, inside Iraq.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/09/10/remembering-the-events-of-911/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military Options and the Economy</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/07/15/military-options-and-the-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/07/15/military-options-and-the-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the UK, the priority should be to command the battle space through intelligence gathering and electronic warfare and by doing so, deliver smaller and more precise weapons accurately where they are needed. In addition, be able to sustain losses of equipment and provide rapid replacement, in other words, to be able to swamp any conflict zone.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/07/15/military-options-and-the-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To keep DNA or Not</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/06/27/to-keep-dna-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/06/27/to-keep-dna-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There will obviously be arguments both for and against retaining DNA samples but, we really should err on the side of basic principles which in this case, is the presumption of innocence, the samples should be destroyed and it be a criminal offence for them to be retained.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2011/06/27/to-keep-dna-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

