<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>baldysblog.co.uk &#187; Religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baldysblog.co.uk/tag/religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk</link>
	<description>Mainly Political, Right of Centre and Personal, not Party Political</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:32:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>That Human Rights Act Again&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/03/21/that-human-rights-act-again/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/03/21/that-human-rights-act-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reform and Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[However, the Judges also said that if same-sex unions became lawful, any church that refuses to marry gay couples could be charged with discrimination.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/03/21/that-human-rights-act-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Killing Babies</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/03/04/killing-babies/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/03/04/killing-babies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Being a Catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=3455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has any society that had a formalised system of killing its own citizens, ever survived for long ? If we accept that infanticide is acceptable, then why not any kind of euthanasia ? The liberal mindset thinks of "assisted dying" as another "personal choice" but once these things are accepted as normal, where might they lead ?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2012/03/04/killing-babies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask the Right Person</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/12/21/ask-the-right-person/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/12/21/ask-the-right-person/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baldy Tales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somerset Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=2686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only people who would 'contribute' on whatever the subject was were those with strong views on one side or the other and therefore, what was the point ? No one would become 'converted' and no one would be 'saved', all that happens is a clash of egos. Perhaps for a time, it may help you to 'sharpen up' on your views and ways of putting them but in the longer term, it is a complete waste of time.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/12/21/ask-the-right-person/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-Pope, Yet Again-How Boring</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/11/16/anti-pope-yet-again-how-boring/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/11/16/anti-pope-yet-again-how-boring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Being a Catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=2573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is both amusing if rather sad also that one only need put “Pope” somewhere in a headline to bring out a lot of lickspittle spite from those who are anti theist by default or those who consider themselves “far too intellectually smart”, no different whether in the reader's columns of the Telegraph, Independent or Guardian.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/11/16/anti-pope-yet-again-how-boring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christmas Shopping</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/11/14/christmas-shopping/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/11/14/christmas-shopping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 19:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baldy Tales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Journey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somerset Levels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=2567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that without romanticising it, my own childhood although of course, not fully appreciated by me at the time, was amazingly happy, a hard act to follow because of the people and the spirit of the times when in post war Britain, people were determined to make best of things and have a good time.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/11/14/christmas-shopping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ray Gosling, Idiot of the Parish</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/02/18/ray-gosling-idiot-of-the-parish/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/02/18/ray-gosling-idiot-of-the-parish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=1899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 70 year old idiot called Ray Gosling went on a regional chat show and claimed that he had killed a former lover suffering from Aids by smothering him with a pillow. The Independent wrote an Editorial questioning all this: http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/leading-articles/leading-article-a-misguided-intervention-1902769.html Gosling&#8217;s claim (if true), was to say the least, totally absurd and if he [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/02/18/ray-gosling-idiot-of-the-parish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Socialist Orthodoxy is the new Fascism</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/04/12/socialist-orthodoxy-is-the-new-fascism/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/04/12/socialist-orthodoxy-is-the-new-fascism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Being a Catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliamentary Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have always found little to distinguish between the sheer bestiality of both Hitler&#8217;s Germany and Stalin&#8217;s Soviet Russia towards human beings. From this as a young man I used to joke about people being Communist but with Fascist tendencies which was to say, these two apparent extremes are really the same. I believe that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/04/12/socialist-orthodoxy-is-the-new-fascism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reform of the Bill of Rights 1688 – No !</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/03/27/reform-of-the-bill-of-rights-1688-%e2%80%93-no/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/03/27/reform-of-the-bill-of-rights-1688-%e2%80%93-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Being a Catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the 1688 Bill of Rights and later reinforced in the Act of Settlement in 1701, Catholics were positively discriminated against so that they could never marry into the Royal Family and become therefore Queen or Queen&#8217;s Consort and retain their religion and therefore an assumed “allegiance to Rome”. The proposal is in a Private [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/03/27/reform-of-the-bill-of-rights-1688-%e2%80%93-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religion is Not Evil, People Often Are&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/02/28/religion-is-not-evil-people-often-are/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/02/28/religion-is-not-evil-people-often-are/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was watching a DT blog the other day written by George Pitcher concerning British Muslims and advocating tolerance and so forth. In no time at all there were quite a flood of comments 90% of which were negative, a number of which were very anti-religion of any kind. As a Catholic of Irish origins [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/02/28/religion-is-not-evil-people-often-are/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

