<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>baldysblog.co.uk &#187; Terror Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baldysblog.co.uk/tag/terror-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk</link>
	<description>Mainly Political, Right of Centre and Personal, not Party Political</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:48:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Liberties</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/01/16/civil-liberties/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/01/16/civil-liberties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=1835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Howard Jacobson wrote an interesting article in the Independent: “Civil liberties or civil protection – which is the more important?” http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/howard-jacobson/howard-jacobson-civil-liberties-or-civil-protection-ndash-which-is-the-more-important-1869544.html The majority of people who mailed in were hostile to his stance but my own feeling was that neither &#8216;side&#8217; was approaching the problems sensibly either. The Basic Problem On the one hand we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2010/01/16/civil-liberties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bitching About China</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/12/29/bitching-about-china/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/12/29/bitching-about-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Far East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=1761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I might find what happens in other Countries objectionable, it has often occurred to me that the constant bitching about what happens in China, Burma, Iran and many others is little short of hypocritical In the sense that coming from the Western countries, it assumes that there is only “one way” that things should [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/12/29/bitching-about-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Very Stupid Policing</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/12/03/very-stupid-policing/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/12/03/very-stupid-policing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Within the UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=1681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was an article in today&#8217;s Independent about photographers being harassed by Police when taking pictures in a public place under something called Section 44. For a more detailed explanation, please read the article: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/warning-do-not-take-this-picture-1833127.html However in simple terms, a “Section 44” is in fact an area deemed to be a potential terrorist target so [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2009/12/03/very-stupid-policing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extending the 28 days&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2007/11/18/extending-the-28-days/</link>
		<comments>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2007/11/18/extending-the-28-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baldy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror Laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldysblog.co.uk/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is absolutely no case for extending detention without charge beyond 28 days and even that (28 days), is questionable in itself. I would suggest that Parliament generally and the Labour Government specifically, have completely failed to grasp the core issues here. Everybody needs to stand back and reassess the whole issue from a different [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://baldysblog.co.uk/2007/11/18/extending-the-28-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
